1/20/2024 0 Comments Matt sharp alliance defending dom![]() ![]() ![]() The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. Set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie is used to record the user consent for the cookies in the "Advertisement" category. It also helps in fraud preventionsĬloudflare sets this cookie to improve page load times and to disallow any security restrictions based on the visitor's IP address. This cookie is used to manage the interaction with the online bots. This cookie is set by the provider Akamai Bot Manager. This cookie is managed by Amazon Web Services and is used for load balancing.Īssociated with Amazon Web Services and created by Elastic Load Balancing, AWSELB cookie is used to manage sticky sessions across production servers. Issued by Microsoft's ASP.NET Application, this cookie stores session data during a user's website visit. This cookie is used by Akamai to optimize site security by distinguishing between humans and bots This cookie is used to detect and defend when a client attempt to replay a cookie.This cookie manages the interaction with online bots and takes the appropriate actions. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. And it would be good if conservatives like Mike Pence – who claims to oppose the practice despite endorsing it previously – would say something about their fellow conservatives who want to keep it legal. It’s still disheartening that conservatives are defending conversion therapy at all. Instead, it will probably be a therapist charging people for a couple sessions a week with the promise that they’ll be straight one day.Īnd, in that case, the ADF would have to prove that conversion therapy isn’t fraudulent, that it really can change someone’s sexual orientation. That case will probably not be a minister telling people about a book. In order for ADF to even file a suit, the state would have to use the law against someone so that ADF would have a case. That’s technically a restriction on speech, but it doesn’t violate the First Amendment. It’s like how California bans stores from labeling products as “Made in California” unless they’re actually made in California. There’s no reason to believe that courts would see this bill differently since it’s specifically about commercial practices. The Supreme Court refused to hear their appeal, effectively affirming the 9th Circuit Court’s ruling that the ban was constitutional because it only applied to licensed mental health professionals, not ministers. Conservatives challenged California’s 2012 ban on conversion therapy for minors, and they lost. If the bill passes and ADF files a lawsuit, they would have an uphill battle before them. They don’t explain how any of that could be interpreted as a “sexual orientation change effort” under California law. Men who struggle with the desire to have sex with little girls can receive counseling, but not those who want to have sex with little boys. Under the ban, victims of sexual abuse can only receive therapy for “unwanted emotional and sexual ties to their abuser” if the abuser is the opposite sex. If a pastor’s sermon is so commercial that the state government considers it more of an advertisement than a religious practice, then something has already gone very wrong in that church.īecause these people cannot stop comparing homosexuality to pedophilia, ADF also said that therapists will be banned from treating pedophiles who go after boys (but not pedophiles who go after girls), as well as victims of sexual abuse by someone of the same sex (but not the opposite sex): The law is about advertising, a form of speech that the Supreme Court has long said could be regulated if it’s false or misleading. And about other books… well, why are pastors hawking their wares from the pulpit? The comment about the Bible is overwrought – it says nothing about conversion therapy. “It could be a violation if a pastor encourages a congregant to visit the church bookstore to purchase books that help people address sexual issues, perhaps including the Bible itself, which teaches about the importance of sexual purity within the confines of marriage between a man and woman,” said Sharp. In an interview with the Baptist Press, Matt Sharp of the ADF said that the bill “ burdens free speech and the free exercise of religion.” While the California law can only be enforced when people purchase a good or service – not when a pastor says something in church – Sharp says that religious leaders could be prosecuted anyway. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |